Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete's RV Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 07:16, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pete's RV Center

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD. Reason was "There is sufficient here to pass speedy deletion, a route already declined, but there is insufficient notability for this company to pass the threshold for the article to remain here. If notability can be shown and verified then it may remain"

There have been additions of source. However, the sources appear to be a mixture of unreliable sources and passing mentions in other sources. It fails on the WP:RS front. Fiddle Faddle 19:42, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been updated with more specifics on magnitude of sales, along with further sources to verify the scope of Pete's RV Center. This is a niche market company that does a significant amount of business and is known across the US and throughout many of the Canadian provinces. This page is informative about the history of the company, is relevant to recreational vehicles, family businesses, camping and more.Delia.coche (talk) 19:49, 4 December 2013 (UTC) — Delia.coche (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 21:11, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 21:11, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article has been further updated with more news and other sources. Comparable companies have been wiki-linked within the article. Dealership ranking in extended warranty sales added. One source addition verifies rise in Canadian customers. Sales magnitude and ranking, history, connection to other organizations establishes further notability.Delia.coche (talk) 21:55, 5 December 2013 (UTC) — Delia.coche (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete Fails WP:Company. I see the usual social media stuff and business listing stuff. I don't see any mentions in regional or national media. Sources given in the article are industry journals or local media. Safiel (talk) 18:42, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 03:35, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - I've been on the fence about this article, but I think the sources are mostly trivial mentions, local publications and some narrow scope publications, the totality of which cause me to lean toward delete. - Mr X 11:57, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.